Showing posts with label Aphrodite. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aphrodite. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

THE SOUL WANTS A LOVE AFFAIR

Sunset, Coronado Bridge, San Diego. Photo by Thad Roan

The soul wants not an altar, but a love affair. ~ Lucrezia (a friend of mine in Florida)

VITA NOVA

The best-selling author, a former monk,
has promised to speak about sex.
The end of the lecture is drawing near:
he’s still trying to define
the difference between spirit and soul.
A middle-aged, conservatively dressed
woman in the front row
begins to rock back and forth,
demanding, “Sex! Sex! Sex!”

The ex-monk blushes. He begins:
“Sex is the archetype of life.
‘I feel totally alive,’ you say
as the world wakes up in your arms.
Sex is a messenger of life,
announcing that despair

is beside the point;
it continues, the banquet of life.
You think you want a new lover,
but what you really want
is a new life.” 

He quotes Dante’s lines:
“In the book of my memory
stands a chapter headed
Incipit vita nova:
Here begins the new life.”

Vita nova. Enter Beatrice.
The hunger for a lover
is the hunger for a new life.

“But,” the speaker cautions,
“there is the drive to couple,
and the drive to uncouple.
It’s possible to be married
and yet to satisfy
the need not to be married.”

He continues: “I strongly advise
against communication in marriage.
Marriage is a great mystery;
sex is always transgressive.
You need to invoke Aphrodite.
She is the Muse of Sex.
She’s also the goddess of affairs.
A new lover may or may not
be the entrance to a new life.”

Will we share a private language,
will we need an alibi?

This is what Aphrodite sings,
faithful only to herself.

I wonder: what is Aphrodite,
that glistening metaphor?
Aphrodite the lover of laughter,
subtle serpent and the dove?
Always faithful to herself,
Aphrodite is the soul.

A tall, skinny man in the back row
rises like a steeple:
“You are speaking totally
from a male point of view.”
“Of course,” the ex-monk replies.
“I wouldn’t presume
to speak from a female point of view.”

A tiny gray-haired lady stands up:
“Thank you for a wonderful lecture.
I also love the way you blush.”
 – “Freud said that blushing
is an erection of the head,”
the speaker jokes. Laughter and applause.
Crashing echoes of departure
from the wooden pews.
We walk out of the soulless cathedral
of Saint Paul into the blushing,
Aphroditic sunset,
and set off in search of a new life.

~ Oriana © 2015

*

This is a poem from an unpublished chapbook, LETTERS TO LUCREZIA. True to my pattern, I sent the chapbook manuscript to only one place, which promptly sent it back. It was the wrong year; that year, they were judging only fiction. So the Letters to Lucrezia became letters to myself, a throwback to the year when Thomas More’s Care of the Soul became a huge bestseller — and then pretty much disappeared from public attention.

More’s message is simple, though he’s found a myriad ways of phrasing it: make taking care of the soul a priority. By “soul” he means the inner life, but with emphasis on feelings and the need for beauty. Oddly, what I remember best from that book is the advice to get a beautiful cup or mug for tea and coffee, and making a nook in the house as beautiful as we can — that will be the temple of our soul.

Now if only writing weren’t so devouring . . .  but then to a writer it’s more satisfying than finding a beautiful coffee mug.

Still, More’s advice was important since it gave me the idea that something outrageously beautiful is indeed worth the money. Keats put it best: “A thing of beauty is a joy forever.”

And that of beauty — an exquisite little cup — may be more important than ever, since we live in a world threatened by ugliness, littered with cheap plastic goods. But, as if to prove Hölderlin’s motto that “where danger is, that which saves us grows also,” there is a relatively new trend: the emergence of artisanal communities. Groups of creative people rent abandoned old factories and set up their workshops. Amateur chefs are drawn to these places and start preparing wonderful meals, using organic vegetables grown in the eco-garden just outside. Since fulfilling work remains an emotional necessity, and traditional jobs are shrinking, arts and crafts are blossoming.

This, too, reflects the soul’s yearning for love affairs — not always with a person, but with a new enthusiasm in life, the kind that is deep and lasting rather than fleeting. Find your craft, find your vocation, and you will find soulmates.

In an interesting back, all this harkens back both to William Morris and Karl Marx. Both warned against alienated labor. Both wanted to substitute creative and scholarly pursuits. Morris wanted to achieve this goal by setting up arts and crafts communities. That takes love. Let’s hope that love wins over greed and soullessness.


Aphrodite was not only the goddess of erotic love. One of her forms was Aphrodite Urania, the "heavenly Aphrodite," the goddess of beauty and inspiration, the patron goddess of the arts. That's why Jean Shinoda-Bolen chose her to be the goddess of creativity, a choice that at first seems unexpected. Shinoda-Bolen expains that a person embarking on a creative project needs to fall in love with that project, to have a love affair with it.


TRIANGLES IN THE SERVICE OF LIFE

Thomas More returns to one of his central messages — have a love affair, but not necessarily with a person — in his new book on creating your personal religion.

“It shouldn’t be a surprise that soon after people get married some new thing comes threatening the status quo. Hillman and Pedraza talk about a triangle as a dynamic force that would be both challenging and life-giving. The triangle might be the typical pattern of a married couple challenged by a third person who may be a lover, a friend, or even a business associate. The third intruding factor might not be a person but a job, a hobby, or an intellectual interest. I’ve known a few married couples dealing with a new religious or spiritual fascination that captured one of the people.

Hillman’s comments on marriage may sound extreme. He says that the fantasies married people have at the beginning, fantasies of togetherness symbolized by an unbroken ring, are delusional and defensive. They keep eros out. They’re rooted in anxiety about the stability of the marriage being threatened. Such an arrangement can’t hold, because life wants to break in on that deathly demand for absolute stability.

Hillman offers a rule of thumb: “The more we rigidly insist upon unity the more diversity will constellate.” He was always in favor of diversity, or psychological polytheism, making it one of the foundational planks in his archetypal psychology. For myself, whenever I hear someone insisting on unity, in whatever context, I worry about the suppression of the soul, which is many-sided and full of the richness and the tension of multiple urges.

So the third factor, whatever it is — the desire for another person, a new job, interest in another country, a new art — will probably disturb the status quo. For me this insight about the delusion of unity and the necessity of a triangle has been a breakthrough idea.

A similar pattern may arise in a person’s religious life. You may grow up in a family in which a certain religious understanding and practice are taken for granted. Then you go to college and discover a larger world. You come home with new ideas, and your family worries about you. In their anxiety, in their delusion of unity and assumption that there is only way to be religious, they find it difficult to embrace their wayward child.

The secret is not to be too literal about a new passion. A triangle is an opportunity for a new vision of life and not necessarily about a new relationship or love interest.”

~ Thomas More, A Religion of One’s Own
 
More correctly points out that taking a strong new interest in anything is like having an affair: our partner may feel neglected and disvalued. Conflicts may arise: the spouse wants to travel while we are in the midst of a creative project. But the marriage (or any relationship) may also gain in stability, because now there is a potent source of satisfaction that frees us from demanding too much from the partner.  


*

I agree with the need for “polytheism of the soul.” The most rewarding part of love is “personality expansion” — what used to be called “personal growth.” The soul needs a love affair because the soul longs to grow. 




Sunday, December 8, 2013

THE FEATHER OF TRUTH AND THE WHORE OF BABYLON


The Feather Against Which My Heart Will Be Weighed

The crow feather I found was not an idea.


The crow feather was a black slash on the green lawn.

It was a way of counting. One. One. 

The crow feather seemed to be waiting for me.


It rested, abided, as though placed just so

for the one time I would walk to its threshold. 

I believe the crow feather when it is in my hand.


I know that it is a feather in my hand,

black quill, inkless, for writing out the gospel.

~ Michael Chitwood, from Poor Mouth Jubilee

**


JUDGMENT DAY

I saved a drowning dragonfly,
with a canopy pole I hoisted him up

from the pool. Without pausing to dry
the stained glass of bronze-veined wings,

he took to the air, a weightless shimmer
zigzagging across the dazzled backyard.

Perhaps this buoyant brilliance
will save me on Judgment Day –

on one scale, my heart
filled with darkness;

on the other, like the Egyptian
Feather of Truth,

a translucent dragonfly wing.
   
~ Oriana Ivy © 2013

In both poems, I’m astonished by the human ability to see far-reaching pattern and meaning in almost anything. Of course we have thousands of years of culture to draw on, including various mythologies. There are patterns and symbols that those mythologies have in common. Black birds like crows are typically messengers of death. The souls are weighed against something that is practically weightless: a feather or one tear from the eye of the goddess of mercy (if we are dealing with a benevolent mythology).

After a friend read my “Judgment Day,” she asked with dismay, “But what if there is no Judgment Day?” “It doesn’t matter,” I replied. Of course there won’t be any literal Judgment Day or the Second Coming any more than my heart will ever be weighed against any feather or an insect wing. “Judgment Day” is every day, if we stop to think about our actions and whether or not we are helping or hurting living things. Then why this persistent use of worn-out mythologies in literature and in the arts in general? 


The earliest manuscript of the Gospel of Mark (“Mark” was a name made-up later; the early texts of the gospels were anonymous)

Generation after generation of writers, why this constant revisionist return to the old mythologies? My answer is that we can’t help it: we are wired to seek meaning and modulate that meaning to serve us now. Finding a meaning is uplifting. It brings us comfort to think (without literally believing) that a crow feather we found is a quill for writing the gospel, or that a weightless dragonfly wing can tip the scales in favor of paradise. Now, you may object, Michael Chitwood’s crow feather is “inkless,” so perhaps the only gospel he could write would be blank -- a fit image of modernity, it could be argued. But this is outweighed by the very fact that the speaker sees a purpose in finding the crow feather, and feels himself chosen for a special task precisely because he found that feather. It was “waiting” for him.

Does he literally believe that the feather was waiting for him? Do I literally believe that the wing of a dragonfly I rescued will open for the me the gates of paradise? Of course not. If we did, we’d probably be on a mental ward, zombified with drugs that are supposed to suppress delusions. Only a schizophrenic would believe that everything is a secret message, an omen, a crow feather a sign that one is chosen to write a new gospel.

But a writer can get away with saying the wildest things because some more general meaning is intended, along with the universal human yearning to be needed, to have a purpose.

And there is beauty in the fact that feathers were once used as quills for writing.

We know that myths often stem from cognitive illusions, e.g. the illusion that everything must have a purpose, or that good actions will be rewarded . . . . And yet, and yet . . .  There is a beauty to mythic stories, and it’s a joy to play with possible symbolism. As long as we are not willing to kill or die for the “truth”and as long as we are thinking symbolically for private joy but don’t try for force others to see what we see (though of course, like Whitman, we invite the reader to believe what we believe), there is no harm. If the poem of this sort is well-written, it gives intellectual and esthetic pleasure of the sort that makes life worth living.

And ultimately, perhaps, it’s the memory value of stories and images. Myths give us both. Daphne changing into laurel is so transformed by beauty that we don’t think of in terms of “sexual harassment” -- though this rescue from unwanted closeness also teaches a subtle lesson that any choice comes with a price. Aphrodite arising from sea-foam is likewise a transfiguration by beauty of the gruesome violence that precedes it. Thanks to this beauty we can rest a bit from the incessant crucifixions and last judgments of religious art, the naked bodies of the damned falling headlong into the flames.

Mythologies can also be non-supportive and anti-life -- at least in some interpretations. Here are five indelible lines from “Blue Stones” by Larry Levis:

My father thought dying
Was like standing trial for crimes
You could not remember.
Then somebody really does throw
The first stone.

This is the result of toxic theology that derives its power from threats of punishment. The message of compassion is lost, and punishment is coming -- even though we can’t even remember our sins. Imagine a mother of six on trial for losing her temper. This is the absurdity we get with anti-human, anti-life religion. 


For historical reasons, on the Hebraic side, ours is a mythology of exile and punishment -- the alternative was to admit that Yahweh was powerless to protect his people, or simply did not care. Better to see each disaster as divine punishment rather than accept impotence or indifference. Better a cruel god than empty air.

Fortunately that’s not the only mythology out there. I like what Joseph Campbell says: “A myth is the dynamic of life. You may or may not know it, and the myth you may be respectfully worshiping on Sunday may not be the one that’s really working in your heart.” Campbell goes on to say that we need to “filter out of the inheritance of traditions those aspects that support you in your own inward life.” 


Some say no, we have to accept the whole package, the cruel and the nasty together with the compassionate and supportive. Those people tend to believe that the whole package  somehow dropped from heaven rather than got created by culturally evolving humans over many centuries. Once we know the human origin of this amazing compilation, once we already ARE being selective -- the bible tends to be quoted VERY selectively -- I say let’s be even more selective. Let’s take only the best and most supportive from each tradition -- that which helps us live. Life should be a joy: not a ledger of sins and failures to live up to impossible standards, but an iridescent beauty like a dragonfly.

*

By the way, biblical scholars -- who study the manuscripts of the gospels in the original Greek -- have discovered that the story of the woman taken in adultery, the origin of the expression “to cast the first stone” -- does not exists in the earliest versions. It was added in the margin by a scribe copying a manuscript, and incorporated into the body of text by a later scribe.

 This indicates that there were stories floating around in the oral tradition, and this one in particular found itself added to the text held to be inerrant and unchangeable. Some would call it a forgery. One of the most revered gospel stories, foundational, of utmost importance to the ethical teachings of Christianity -- a forgery?

Everyone loves this story. Removing it would cause an uproar. Considering the lesson it teaches, does it matter if it’s invented -- a myth, a legend that just happens to fit the teachings better than anything else?

*

DARK AND DARKER

There are many dark passages in Larry Levis. This one speaks to me in a very personal way:

Each day at noon
I used to close my eyes,
And lie alone in the dark, listening.
And you never spoke,
Never uttered the thin prayer that was me.

In the poem Levis is addressing his own “spirit.” There is a poetic tradition of addressing one’s own soul. Now that many don’t believe in having a soul (unless as a synonym for the ever-shifting mental life), such addressing of the soul is almost bound to come up empty. The soul will not speak to us. It doesn’t care about us at all. No surprise.

But I react to this passage for a different reason. Once a year or so, I decide to “give god yet another chance.” I lie down and send a humble supplication into the air: please give me a sign that you exist. I don’t expect a voice from the whirlwind. I don’t expect the clouds to open to reveal the “eye in the sky.” Any subtle sign will do. The shadow of a twig moving across a corner of the wall. Some faint music. A rustle or a barely audible whisper.

I turn into total attention. And the result is, at best, only the steady hum of the refrigerator. Nothing, nothing, nothing.

I realize that a theist would object to this exercise. Never mind my attentiveness: the divine reveals itself only at its own choosing. So far it has not chosen to. I may not be a worthy vessel: an intellectual and not a simple housewife, the kind who tends to get abducted by aliens.

There is a sadness about this silence of the missing god, but also a challenge to name something else that helps me live. What’s interesting is that this “something” also responds only when it’s ready. I mean that which is sometimes called the “cognitive and creative unconscious.” I have a private name for it, but it shall not be revealed. In public, I also call it “the other self.” This too is a bit awkward, since it’s a process, not a static entity: the mysterious processing of information that the brain does “on the back burner.” I pose a question; the answer will come when it’s ready. 

You could say I trust my brain. I trust that in time it will find that one-in-a-million missing pieces of information -- as long as at some forgotten time I put it there. I trust my brain not because it’s infallible, but because on the whole it’s reliable and performs amazing (to me at least) feats.

I’ve come to trust my brain, meaning I trust myself. I am not a fallen creature bent on evil except if I go to confession and cleanse my dirty soul (car wash images intrude here). I trust myself to be kind to others, relying on the empathy I was born with and developed later without any conscious effort. I trust that my intricate brain can grasp complex ideas and enjoy metaphors. I trust myself, and not the “prophet” who stands in the busiest corner of downtown with a sign that the world will end before the year is over. I very much enjoy the description of the Whore of Babylon and the Catholic Encyclopedia’s attempt to refute the argument that the Vatican is the Whore of Babylon. I enjoy it all, but for the perception of reality, I trust myself. What a concept. 


(A shameless digression: Even when I believed in god, I didn’t trust him. He was not to be trusted. “Where were you when I needed you?” is for me a religious anthem. God does not protect children from abuse and misfortune, as Ivan Karamazov brilliantly points out before stating, If my entry to paradise is bought with one tear of a tortured child, I return the ticket.

One of the first things a child learns about god from experience rather than from catechism is that god doesn’t answer prayers in any reliable fashion, and he permits dreadful things to go on. So what use is he? He keeps you scared. He is the ultimate judge and executioner. It was said that if not for the fear of god, people would lead a life of sin, and even crime. What I saw was that criminals went to prison, so apparently that fear of divine justice didn’t work too well: we needed human justice after all. Later I learned that people were good or bad apparently in proportion to the amount of empathy they felt for others; social and economic factors also played a role. Empathy, universal in all social species of mammals, is another reason I am so impressed by the brain.)

(Another shameless digression. A reader asked me, in what I imagined a shocked tone of voice: “But Oriana, what if after you die you wake up and discover you are fully conscious and accountable for your life?” I replied that I hold myself accountable for my life right here, on earth. But if I found myself fully conscious after dying, what a wonderful surprise! And knowing that I haven’t done anything that would merit eternal damnation, what is there to fear? But if god tosses into eternal fire all those who because of an accident of birth did not hold the correct belief -- millions of Hindus, for example -- then he is worse by far than Hitler.)

But I know I will not “wake up” after death. Only a living brain produces consciousness. I’m amazed by both the conscious and the unconscious processes. I love the way the brain can make some use of whatever comes its way: accidental discovery of some old notes, for instance, or passages in books opened at random. Sometimes this could be called inspiration, and it can be fairly complex. Sometimes it’s simply recall of something long-forgotten: what is the name of that California tree that’s like a poplar, but with a thicker trunk, and grows near streams, in the ravines? Paper tree, my consciousness instantly suggests, but I know that’s wrong. I think my answer may be in a poem by Larry Levis. I get out of bed (it’s past my bedtime), find the book, and start reading Larry Levis. The word is stubbornly missing. I drop the book and turn off the light. And instantly I know: cottonwood. I get out of bed to scribble “cottonwood” on a slip of paper, but know it’s not really necessary: I’ll remember it when I wake up.

And I do. I also decide to use some of Larry Levis for the blog post you are now reading.

And here is his Daphne -- the ending of the poem “The Two Trees,” in which he is so starved for connection that his only friends are two trees on campus. In springtime, one of the trees, not the sturdy oak but the one that seemed more feminine, “sleepier, more slender”

that seemed frail, but was really


Oblivious to everything. Simply oblivious to it,


With the pale leaves climbing one side of it,

An obscure sheen in them,

And the other side, for some reason, black bare,


The same, almost irresistible, carved indifference

In the shape of its limbs
As if someone's cries for help


Had been muffled by them once, concealed there,

Her white flesh just underneath the slowly peeling bark

—while the joggers swerved around me and I stared—
Still tempting me to step in, find her,

                           And possess her completely.  





DRAGONFLIES VERSUS JUSTICE

Now, just for the joy of it, some interesting facts about dragonflies:

The dragonfly can move at an amazing 45 miles an hour, hover like a helicopter fly backwards like a hummingbird, fly straight up, down and on either side. What is mind blowing is the fact that it can do this while flapping its wings a mere 30 times a minute while mosquitoes and houseflies need to flap their wings 600 and 1000 times a minute respectively. The dragonfly accomplishes its objectives with utmost simplicity, effectiveness and well, if you look at proportions, with 20 times as much power in each of its wing strokes when compared to the other insects. The best part is that the dragonfly does it with elegance and grace that can be compared to a ballet dancer.

The dragonfly has a 360-degree vision.

The dragonfly exhibits iridescence both on its wings as well as on its body. Iridescence is the property of an object to show itself in different colors depending on the angle and polarization of light falling on it.

Dragonflies have inhabited our planet for almost 300 million years.

The dragonfly is such an intricate and gorgeous little being that it’s easy to understand our bedazzlement when one appears while we are thinking about justice, perhaps, and how there are two kinds: justice meant as punishment, vengeance; and justice as fairness, as in equal pay for equal work. Anne Carson’s suggests that a dragonfly is much more interesting than ideas.

God’s Justice




In the beginning there were days set aside for various tasks.

On the day He was to create justice

God got involved in making a dragonfly



and lost track of time.

It was about two inches long

with turquoise dots all down its back like Lauren Bacall.



God watched it bend its tiny wire elbows

as it set about cleaning the transparent case of its head.

The eye globes mounted on the case



rotated this way and that

as it polished every angle.

Inside the case



which was glassy black like the windows of a downtown bank

God could see the machinery humming

and He watched the hum



travel all the way down turquoise dots to the end of the tail

and breathe off as light.

Its black wings vibrated in and out.



~ Anne Carson, Glass, Irony and God




Charles:

Your dragonfly poem reminds me of the haiku about the dragonfly (“a dry stick: put on wings: a dragonfly”). They are both uplifting at the end.

So much wisdom in Judgment Day being every day. I love that.
You blog and your poems "give intellectual and esthetic pleasure of the sort that makes life worth living."

..."people were good or bad apparently in proportion to the amount of empathy they felt for others": Yes!

Love the information on dragonflies and the final poem by Anne Carson.


Oriana:

I know others too have said that every day is Judgment Day. We have to be accountable at a moment’s notice: here is the good I’ve done; here’s what I regret having done -- without dwelling too much on either.

Thursday, June 30, 2011

PERSEPHONE’S KITCHEN

Dante Gabriel Rossetti: Persephone

EURYDICE IN MILWAUKEE

            At least I have the flowers of myself.
                                    ~ h.d.


“Your life would have been
so much happier,” a neighbor sighs,
“if you had been born

in this country.” Then I wouldn’t
have had Warsaw, trembles
my first thought. Memories rush in:

Eurydice at seventeen,
from a Milwaukee suburb
I take a bus downtown –

seeking that giant hum,
that multiple living heart.
I get off when I see the first

tall buildings at last.
But these stand empty, dead,
block after abandoned block.

I walk on and read the scars
of torn-off signs and names;
I’m fractured in cracked mirrors

of the gutted stores.
Sheets of old newspapers
fly at me like crumbling ghosts.

On the pavement, mildewed files,
frayed tangles of electric cords;
in the windows, crooked, stained,

half-shut yellowed shades.
Still disbelieving, I walk on
in tunnels of hissing wind.

Echoes crash in my wake:
alone alone alone –
as I walk toward the blue

window of Lake Michigan
glistening at the end. (Old friend,
are you still waiting for me there?)

*

Talent is how deep you go in,
walking against the wind
in empty labyrinths. Kind

neighbor, can you understand?
Some of us are driven
by a hunger more terrifying

than the pursuit of happiness.
Call me Eurydice –
I’ve lost a world, but gained

the dark flowers of myself –
not the brief blossoms we give
to brides and to the dead.

~ Oriana © 2011


This poem is not about my loss of Warsaw so much as about my loss of America. I mean the idealized, imaginary America in my mind after I arrived in real America. I was seventeen. That combination – loss of both Poland and America – was to be the first in the series of my “Persephone experiences.” (Eurydice can be seen as a version of Persephone.)

In my early teens, in Warsaw, I fell in love with Greek mythology. I thought it was possible to choose your own special goddess. A fierce young intellectual, I longed for Athena at my side – Athena the super-intelligent, with her brilliant strategies and unfailing guidance and protection of heroes. Now and then I also longed for Aphrodite to lend me her charms and help me in matters of love, but with the understanding that this was a secondary goddess. As my personal goddess, I chose Athena.

Soon enough I learned that you do not choose your god or goddess. Life (or call it fate, or circumstances), in combination with your deep self, chooses for you. Past the age of seventeen and a half, the only goddess I identified with was Persephone.

Persephone is a dual goddess, with two manifestations. The more familiar one is the traumatized maiden, Kore. Yet there is also Persephone the queen, the wise woman who understands the deepest mysteries. She “has been there.” But here is the most wonderful part: when the season is right, Persephone ascends from the Underworld to bring the gift of springtime to the world. Flowers spring up where she steps. She also has a fascinating companion. Hecate (who stands for wisdom and magic) is said to both precede and follow Persephone/Kore. 

I was so identified with the traumatized maiden part of the Persephone myth that I rarely remembered the mature Queen – paradoxically the death goddess who is also the goddess of life. But even when I did remember her, did I ever want to become Persephone the Queen? Does anyone want to be Persephone? The youthful trauma marks the Persephone woman forever. The only good part seems to be having more empathy for the suffering of others. And traveling between worlds (in the sense of re-visiting trauma, though the underworld can be defined in many different ways) may be connected to creativity, but is it the only way?

Trauma may be the necessary ingredient for becoming an artist. But creative work later on can be motivated in other ways, can’t it? – or so I’d love to believe. (If there is a god who comes close to being the male equivalent of Persephone, it’s Hephaistos. Rejected by his mother, lame as a result of his forced fall from Olympus, he becomes a craftsman and an artist – the wonderful shield of Achilles goes beyond mere craft. As Lionel Trilling observed, it is not trauma that distinguishes the artist, but the ability to rise above it.)

Most men in my life seem to have related to my Aphrodite side, unaware of the traumatized girl. I think only one man saw me as a young Persephone, orphaned in an alien world, and that brought out his protective side.

Possibly my first great love also saw that vulnerable side, the nervousness, the low self-esteem – but his response was cruelty, which, along with other misfortunes, imprisoned me in trauma for the rest of my youth. In fact I’m not sure if it’s even possible for me to be happy in a carefree way because I was so deeply devastated in my young adulthood, my spirit broken, my faith in myself shattered. But carefree happiness is not the only kind.

It took many years, but I dare say I have recovered. I have developed skills and acquired resources. But the awareness I gained in my youth – that the worst can happen, and not just to someone else, but to me – that knowledge cannot be erased. The duality of Persephone is my duality as well. The darkness is always at the edge of my consciousness. It doesn’t mean that I can’t have plenty of happy, even ecstatic moments.

Still, I realize that while I have had a good share of “Persephone experiences” (which, Frightened Reader, I am wise enough not to enumerate), in the end I have been spared the worst fate which can and does befall some Persephone women: they never come out of chronic depression, their gifts ungiven, their lives wasted. I saw what was in store for me, and, practically in the last moment, I managed to rescue myself. In an instant that was years in the making, I realized that it was simply too late in life for depression.

It’s not that I decided to be happy – my revulsion against happiness was too long-standing for that. (I couldn’t understand why a brilliant man like Jefferson could even come up with that absurd phrase, “the pursuit of happiness.” Wasn’t his life about the pursuit of excellence instead?) I did not decide to be happy. But I did decide not to be depressed, and that changed everything. I have not had a single relapse, and after two years I am – surprise! – rather – dare I say it? – happy. I love my quiet life – outwardly the same life I had before my perception changed.

I have met three other people who also told me they made the decision not to be depressed, so I know I am not the only person to have followed the path of closing that familiar door and making a commitment. But I would never claim that this is a solution for others. Everyone is different, with a unique life history, and deep decisions ripen strangely, slowly, suddenly. The insight that changes everything may seem to come a fraction of a second, but in fact it was years in the making. I stood there, thrown out of depression, stunned by the slamming door of “too late,” knowing that there was no way back in. I stood there homeless, so to speak, barred from my old shelter and forced to cope and engage with the world – so I did.


[Persephone and Hades depicted on a vase, the British Museum. Note that Hades holds the cornucopia, a symbol of plenty. Scholars are unsure as to what it is that Persephone holds -- a pomegranate fruit? At first glance, I thought she was knitting.]



FROM VICTIM TO QUEEN: GAINING VALUABLE SKILLS AND SUPPORTIVE FRIENDS


The transformation from Persephone the Traumatized Maiden to Persephone the Queen does not mean that the woman becomes invulnerable to trauma. Alas, unlike in the myth, in life the rape of Persephone may happen more than once, in various forms – the shattering of dreams and hope can happen in various realms. But the inspiring part of the myth – the transformation from Maiden to Queen – does make the woman less vulnerable to being devastated/destroyed by trauma. I want to emphasize here that this is not the effect of the transformation, and not repeated trauma in the absence of transformation, which is disastrous.

Strength and maturity matter – if you’ve survive once, you know you can survive again and can build on that knowledge. Learning valuable skills matters. It matters tremendously. Knowing how to turn pain into art – or turning to dedicated work in any field – is a triumph of the spirit that makes us less afraid of suffering, since “even the bad is good” – it’s a goldmine of material and/or “learning experiences” (barring extreme circumstances).

Thus, the “pursuit of happiness” is the wrong motto at the early stage of the Maiden-into-Queen transformation. A misguided – or simply unlucky – pursuit of happiness may have brought on the initial trauma in the first place. A more appropriate motto might be the “pursuit of excellence.” Once Persephone gains excellence at doing something, in any field, she builds a foundation of strength and more secure self-esteem. Once a valuable skill is gained and excellence achieved, she may then discover, to her great surprise, that in fact she lives for pleasure – for delight of the deepest kind.

Another set of helpful skill is psychological and social savvy that come simply from life experience: being able to recognize red flags. This can work very well for trauma prevention. A recovering Persephone also learns the value of cultivating supportive friendships, including at least one with an Athena-type woman, with her practical intelligence and disdain for romantic follies. Add to this having not just “a room of your own” but an income of your own (for some reason, Virginia Woolf’s second requirement is rarely quoted) – and even Persephone has a chance of leaving bad memories behind and stepping into a productive and fulfilled life. From crying fits over the past to meaningful work, endurance and splendor – this is what Persephone teaches.

Recognizing that what seems bad can be a hidden blessing is certainly valuable skill. One interesting New Age writer, Byron Katie, suggests that when something adverse happens, we should say, “This is happening for me” rather than “to me.” Persephone women who manage to transform into Queen may be late bloomers, even very late bloomers; but the flowering can be astonishing indeed.

Anna Kaminska, a Polish poet, made a statement that at first struck me as outrageous: “We always receive more than we desire. We receive what we ask for, but sometimes in a different currency, a currency that turns out to be of greater worth.” Since my life has been so rich in shattered dreams and outright travesties, my first impulse was to exclaim, "Hey, mystic poet, wake up! The essence of life is that we don’t get what we desire." (Well, once in a while we do, and the shattering of the dream happens with delay; as Teresa of Avila famously observed, “More tears are shed over answered prayers than over unanswered ones.”)

That larger consciousness goes hand in hand with “having a life” – and that matters most of all. If you love your work, you have a daily, reliable source of happiness. You have a practice, a creative routine to which you turn even during hurricane season. It now becomes difficult for a demonic-type man (for instance, a charismatic man who turns out to be a cruel narcissist) to destroy you; he will seek easier prey among the innocent and the weak, those who “don’t have a life” and are waiting for a male savior.

That the presumed male savior may turn out to be one of life’s cruel jokes – an alcoholic, for instance – is not as interesting as arriving at the transformed vision of the life you already have. The marriage that in youth may have been experienced as a prison may in middle age come be perceived as exactly the kind of stable foundation that you need. You married the right man after all! 

As for the Prince, how lucky that he didn’t come, with his demands that you become his “service person.” Perhaps the only way for a woman to become a Queen is not to marry a Prince, especially not in youth, when you haven’t yet found your own path.

One of the important events that led to my insight was a lecture on Aphrodite and the “Aphrodite woman.” To me, most of the lecture seemed to pertain to Persephone rather than Aphrodite. And then I saw the fusion of the two goddesses.

October, the month of Persephone’s descent, seemed to be a month of fate for me, along with my birth month, April, Aphrilis, Aphrodite’s month, sometimes equated with Persephone’s ascent. The pomegranate was sacred to both goddesses. If the golden Aphrodite is another phase/face of Persephone, the circle is completed, the suffering transmuted into art and/or of personality enlargement, similar to what happens when a person falls in love (often a combined Aphrodite/Persephone experience).

In neurological rather than mythic terms, the traumatized young Persephone is mainly the dysfunctional, hyperactive amygdala that causes so much suffering in the post-traumatic stress disorder. But there is another part of the brain that can calm down the screaming amygdala, and that’s the left pre-optic frontal cortex: the seat of (dare we say it?) reason, focus, insight, creativity. Here was Athena after all. But when it comes to the healing power of music and beauty and pleasure, we are back to Aphrodite.

Perhaps the worst part of trauma, of being identified with Persephone, is having a well-developed inner hell, with many mansions. An innocuous-seeming detail, a minor stressor, can drop a traumatized woman down into one of those inner infernal mansions, into the corridors of howling. Yet even in the darkest hell, what is that glimmer? It’s Aphrodite who glows and smiles, reminding a woman that she, too, is Aphrodite and has some of Aphrodite’s charisma, the magic that can transform anything into beauty. Let me repeat what Lionel Trilling said: it's not trauma that distinguishes the artist, but the ability to rise above it. 

The challenge of a Persephone-identified woman is to learn how to rescue herself from her inner hell. Athena provides insight, and that may be enough. But it also helps to focus on Aphrodite’s smile. Aphrodite imparts the glow of positive emotions, the memories of being loved. Persephone must learn to remember that she is also Aphrodite.

But this is not the only way in which Aphrodite can function as a savior. I have recently re-read the Aphrodite chapter in Jean Shinoda’s Goddesses in Older Women (Harper and Collins, 170-176). Already the subtitle struck a chord: “Lover, Creative Woman.” For Shinoda, Aphrodite is also the goddess of creativity. It’s not only that she is attracted to creative men, becomes their muse, believes in their talent and nurtures them before they gain recognition. What is even more important is that Aphrodite has her own artistic side. The Aphrodite woman can be intensely engaged in her own creative work.

As Jean Shinoda puts it, “Aphrodite is also the archetype of creativity. The same intensity and total absorption that happens when we fall in love is essential to the creative process” (p. 173). My own experience bears it out: the artist falls in love with the work in progress. Like Aphrodite the lover, s/he must be intensely in the moment, and both focused and receptive.

This is possibly the most original contribution of Shinoda’s presentation of the goddess archetypes. Aphrodite as the goddess of beauty and love has been with us for a millennia; Aphrodite as the goddess of creativity has not been paid much attention. Persephone is in part a goddess of creativity through her gift of travel between the worlds and imparting an aura of mystery (and poetry thrives on mystery). But Aphrodite can be a particularly empowering archetype for creative women – as well as for intellectual women such as scientists, or any other women whose work is intensely absorbing, and creates experiences similar to falling in love.

When such women are fulfilled by their work, I’ve often seen what I call the “smile of Aphrodite” on their faces. It’s like the radiance of a woman in love. I’ve seen on the face of a woman mycologist explaining to me why the study of fungi is the most fascinating field in the world; I’ve seen it on the faces of dancers and weavers. I remember the liberating moment when I realized that I can be totally intellectual and totally feminine; not only was there no contradiction, but it created a special charisma. After all, Aphrodite is the goddess of love; that love need not be focused exclusively on relationships with men.

I happen to know many creative women, and they strike me as Persephone-Aphrodite women – with enough of Athena and/or Artemis traits to enable them to cope with the world. Yet their mystery and creative powers seem to stem from that ability to take Persephone’s suffering and transmute it into Aphrodite’s gold.

If Aphrodite stands for the happy woman, and Persephone for the unhappy one, that division is of course an oversimplification and downright distortion. Aphrodite does experience love’s sorrows; it’s that she has learned that the gifts of love are worth it in spite of the pain that love also brings. And Persephone who matures into the Queen also comes to realize that it is blissful to withdraw from the world into the inner world (for me the underworld means primarily the inner world, which requires solitude). When the time is ripe, she finds it just as blissful to ascend into connection with others. Maybe because she has already suffered so much before maturity, Persephone is dazzled by all the happiness that is now hers. I dare put forth this radical thesis: mature Persephone is the happiest goddess.


Needless to say, Persephone’s empathy, depth, and rich inner life are indispensable creative assets as well. And besides, is Persephone the Queen perhaps none other than Aphrodite, dewy with reflected light?

PERSEPHONE’S KITCHEN

Deep summer. I eat gold squash

and black plums. Persephone says
she makes the soul at high heat,

out of darkness and desire,
that first fatal pomegranate seed.
Aphrodite makes her half of the soul

stirring in birds, the dolphin leap.
“Be happy like God,” Aphrodite
dares. Persephone regrets

nothing; Aphrodite sings
for her dead. I’ve feasted on grief
long enough. My youth is gone,

I’m ripe for life. Autumn fog,
Persephone’s wind-riven veil,
will sweep us away, but it’s August,

sun spills into the lucent grass,
and you say yes, tonight,
let’s consume

our bodies while they last,
the ground split with fallen figs,
golden apples, plums.

~ Oriana © 2011
Thomas Hart Benton: Persephone

Hyacinth:


Some favorite lines:

let’s consume

our bodies while they last,
the ground split with fallen figs,
golden apples, plums.

"I'm fractured in cracked mirrors"

"crumbling ghosts"

"the dark flowers of myself"

~ each one could make a whole poem

Oriana:

Yes, that's the power of imagery -- each image holds so much in it. When I research the pomegranate, in particular, the symbolism was all over the place, but what particularly struck me was that the pomegranate was sacred to both Persephone and Aphrodite. 


Mary (in Chicago):


Lovely poems and reflections, Oriana. And yes, your old friend Lake Michigan is still there, right where the last Ice Age created her. Just a few blocks from where I live, in fact.

Oriana:

I have a poem about Lake Michigan that’s more like a fragment:


LAKE MICHIGAN


Seventeen, alone and scared,
I thought, “I exchanged
Warsaw for this?”
looking at stunted suburban homes,

downtown’s abandoned streets.
You were my sole sublime:
a lake so huge I couldn’t see
the other shore.

A lake with respectable waves,
like a sea bay!
I watched you slap at the stone jetty.
Cold spray lashed out at the lamp posts.

During those months of weeping,
I knew you were there,
waves without end,
gray water underneath white fog.

In November’s stinging sleet,
I loved how you owned the horizon.
You were an image of my life:
I could see only gleaming distance.

Great Lake of memory,
you are still like life:
I cannot see the other shore.
When winter’s winds come like knives,

before I say “I know, I know,”
I will remember you,
that year my only friend,
the dancing way you had with light.

~ Oriana © 2011

**

I am still awed when I think about the Great Lakes – the largest fresh-water lakes in the world: amazing!

It was an extremely difficult time in my life, but for a writer, “even the bad is good,” as a poet-friend observed. Not that I knew it at the time. It’s only now that I am grateful for at least some of my Persephone experiences. 

Ursula:


Perhaps you can put these poems in a collection: "Immigrant," "The Girl from Warsaw," "The Myths of the Immigrant." Each one of them captures the experience in a different way. I read so many stories when they arrive, they work hard, success! Your poems are real. Like adoption, immigration is based on loss and the loss never diminishes.

Oriana:

Thank you for that interesting analogy with adoption. Yes, immigration is adoption after all, but without kind new parents to nurture and instruct you, and any immigrant could use such parents . . . And the loss is double, because after a while (sometimes even a short while) you don't fit in the country of origin; you have unalterably changed by having stepped out of your circle and experienced what may be a radically different world. You’ve eaten the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. So the original "I could always go back" escape clause disappears.

What I read decades too late is that immigration is something you do for your children. This strikes me as a wise statement. Now if that bit of wisdom had gotten through to me at the age of, say, sixteen, I dare say it would have hit me between the eyes!! It seems incredible now, but I had zero awareness of immigrant realities. Sure, I'd heard about homesickness, but -- I know this will sound crazy, but remember the teen brain is not very developed -- I thought it wouldn't happen to ME!!! What propelled was definitely not any idea of sacrifice for the sake of my future children. I expected no homesickness, no hardship, no tears -- just each day being an exciting adventure of a sort I couldn't quite imagine . . . 

That day when I set out to “see Milwaukee,” I found myself walking in a nightmarish, deathly landscape of abandoned streets, the Dead City, one of the several underworlds I was to experience. Many years later I managed to capture the experience.

A friend told me she once found herself in an abandoned section of New York, and it was profoundly unsettling.

Even normal, "live" parts of any American city can unnerve an outsider because of the absence of people on the sidewalks (typically). A European thinks (or used to think) that a city is supposed to be "humming with life."  When I was in my teens, crowded sidewalks also meant safety and a kind of anonymous community. In addition, streets were a part of history. To abandon any part of the city, to just let it decay, would have been a sacrilege, a heartless abandonment. But then I myself could have easily been accused of heartlessness back then, having just abandoned the familiar streets for an imaginary “promised land.” 


Charles:


It’s wonderful that in Persephone women have this role model of transformation from victim to queen, but what about men? Men also suffer from trauma and depression. Is there a myth that addresses that?

Oriana:

Thank you, Charles, for asking a very important question. Even though men on the whole rate themselves as more happy as women (the notorious “happiness gap”), and even though testosterone is the “happy hormone” that produces an orientation toward action rather than brooding, there is no denying that trauma and depression affect men as well, often with tragic consequences (men are more likely to succeed at suicide).



In Re-Visioning Psychology, James Hillman tries to make the “Persephone experience” relevant for men as well:


“Each of us enacts Persephone in soul, a maiden in a field of narcissi or poppies, lulled drowsy with innocence and pretty comforts until we are dragged off and pulled down by Hades, our intact natural consciousness violated and opened to the perspective of death. Once this has happened – through a suicidal despair, through a sudden fall from a smooth-rising career, through an invisible depression in whose grip we struggle vainly – then Persephone reigns in the soul and we see life through her darker eye.” (p. 208)

This universalizing is impressive, but emotionally there remains a gap: a man is simply not going to see himself as Persephone, while for me the identification was both unwelcome and unavoidable. Eventually I managed to perceive and welcome Persephone the Queen, the form of the goddess to which I was blind in my youth. And thus the myth became not frightening (the way the Dead City was frightening in “Eurydice in Milwaukee”), but healing. If a man hopes to be empowered by a mythological story, I think the story practically requires a male protagonist. 

The myth that can empower at least some men is that of Hephaestus, whom I see as the “wounded artist.” Hephaestus experienced parental rejection (to put it mildly); afterwards, he suffered because of Aphrodite’s betrayal. Nevertheless, we don’t think of Hephaestus as a victim. That’s because he became a wonderful craftsman and visual artist. No, we never think of him as a victim; we think of his excellence and his marvelous creations. His salvation and his joy lay in giving himself to creative work.

A more problematic myth is that of Dionysus, the god of ecstasy. Dionysus is often called “twice born.” He is dismembered, then resurrected. He stirs women to both ecstasy and madness. As a male savior, he rescues his mother from Hades and marries the abandoned Ariadne; on the other hand, as the leader of frenzied Maenads (think of today’s celebrity groupies), he is hardly a role model. There is a bipolar pattern here, not the security of the daily smithy of Hephaestus. But as the god of ecstasy, Dionysus cannot be ignored. He may serve as a reminder to “let yourself go.” Jean Cocteau said, “Genius, in art, consists in knowing how far we may go too far.”



Remembering Dionysus may also be helpful in recovery from trauma. What does Dionysus learn from being torn apart, then resurrected? He learns that he can survive. And this may be inspiration enough. Dionysus, the god of the life force, cannot be destroyed. This is a message that turns against despair. Something in you is inviolable; it will survive and heal you.

Dionysus reminds me of another myth that helped me: the story of Ariadne abandoned on the island of Naxos. Dionysus comes to her in her despair, and she becomes the god’s bride. For me the equation was simple: marry your art. I’ll develop this in the next post.



Michael:

So it is a shared experience for those who have been in Persephone's kitchen, male or female, to learn to walk with Persephone's face – the cover, the mask, and only by looking closely can an observer see the knowing that lives in the eyes or in the subtle folds of the face (the sad knowing). If divined, it would reveal the truth about that place in which we grew, as Rilke knew, and lamented: "If I had grown in some generous place, if my hours had opened in ease, I'd make a lavish banquet for you, my hands wouldn't clutch at you like this, so needy and tight."

Recently I spent two weeks with my mother.  It was the first time I saw clearly the world in which I'd grown. I was compelled to verbalize that place, which meant wrapping my mother and father in words, and the words were reluctantly called up, they were harsh and unpleasant, and haltingly whispered. And still, I can only say them to myself. At first I thought I'd lost the idealized dream of what I thought I'd been, what my family was, and how I'd grown. I welcomed yet another painful departure, yet another good-bye wave I've learned so well at mid-age. And this got me thinking about loss, which I'm now thinking is more about finding than losing. And isn't this the essence of your thought here?



I’ve lost a world, but gained

the dark flowers of myself –
not the brief blossoms we give
to brides and to the dead.

Naming the stark place of intellectual, emotional, and spiritual poverty in which I grew has strangely buoyed me along. No wonder, I say, I've struggled so. I've had a long journey just to catch up, much less to excel. And I remain at the threshold of that world, foot in, foot out, circling, not quite able to look away finally, or forever.
So yes,
My youth is gone,

I’m ripe for life. Autumn fog,
Persephone’s wind-riven veil,
will sweep us away, but it’s August,

sun spills into the lucent grass,
and you say yes, tonight,
let’s consume

our bodies while they last,
the ground split with fallen figs,
golden apples, plums.

Beyond enjoying the profound beauty of these verses (and they are profoundly beautiful), I read them as wistful, and as a surrendering to the only meaning that's left.

"I’m not sure if it’s even possible for me to be happy in a carefree way because I was so deeply devastated in my young adulthood, my spirit broken, my faith in myself shattered. But carefree happiness is not the only kind."

I can only sigh. This is out of my soul.

Related: I’ve been thinking about time and the psyche. No questions, per se, just thinking. I’m awed that I can be child again, or infant, or young man, that I can smell in those places, feel and touch, and memories are alive in my body, pulsing with a joy, a pain, and in an instant, I return to the present. And I've puzzled over time on the trail – the usual markers for distance and time are not functional, like being outside of time – I see the hiker pause when asked which day it is, the word day being unfamiliar, and then the blank expression while searching for a hold, a marker, to remind which day it is, whatever that means, and the concept of day, of time, remains foreign and very unwelcome.

Stirred by your blog. Thank you.    


Oriana:
Thank you, Michael, for this rich poetic response.
Time is indeed partly foreign to us, since in the inner life we can call up an image from childhood, or imagine ourselves in ancient old age. Also, we think according to our personal landmarks, and not in terms of, say, July 2, 1996, 2:15 pm. So the external time doesn’t feel quiet real. (An Alaska joke: What were you doing on the night from October to April?)
The pomegranate, sacred to both Persephone and Aphrodite, was a symbol of the womb, and thus of fertility. This fits Aphrodite, but it is particularly striking when we consider Persephone. Of course we must not forget that each spring Persephone becomes the goddess of life. Still, it is because she ate those “fertility seeds” that Persephone must return to the Underworld. Is there a hint here that fertility requires some degree of withdrawal from the busy upper world, some quiet time? This would hold true for artistic creativity. But pregnant women also often seem withdrawn, as Rilke beautifully observed in his masterpiece, “Orpheus. Eurydice. Hermes.”
A friend of mine calls her meditation “doing my gratitudes.” This is coming easier and easier to me as well. What you say about the way you grew up made me feel grateful for my very rich childhood. I don’t mean material wealth, especially not in the American sense – what a laugh that would be, our cramped make-shift apartment in Warsaw (I will never forget how a visiting American scientist exclaimed: “You are so poor! Yet everywhere I go, there is art on the walls, there are flowers on the table.” I was astonished at his astonishment.)
Yes, there were flowers on the table. There was money for vacations and ballet lessons, private English lessons and German lessons, and certainly for what books were to be found in the rather bizarre bookstores behind the Iron Curtain (I wonder how many people still remember that phrase). As a daughter of two Ph.D.’s, I grew up with what might be called “intellectual privilege.” This had both benefits and drawbacks, since as soon as I left Warsaw, my life went downhill in some important ways, and I could never regain the intellectual richness of my original milieu. That was my first “Persephone experience.” Some losses are just losses, impossible to translate into a gain – though on the whole I agree with the idea that a loss can be a hidden gain. 


Or maybe the human brain is so creative that it will find a gain in almost anything, given the innate drive to do so. Once I said, "I came to America in order to be traumatized enough to become a poet." Only when I noticed the expression of shock on the faces of my friends did I realize how extreme that sounds. Of course there is no real answer here in terms of purpose; it's just an instance of how the mind will latch onto anything rather than admit the suffering was useless.
Or else the loss and gain are in different realms. Not long ago I was “doing my gratitudes” and pondered that just being able to watch the sunset on the Pacific is paradise. On the other hand, I also felt mournful thinking of two of my friends reading at The Tender Barbarian (named after the title of a Czech novel), a café/bookstore near the University of Warsaw. I also thought of a local poetry workshop I once attended, in a place with a glorious view of the Pacific. I presented a poem with Orpheus in the title. The two male participants were both indignant. One (a former lawyer) said with passion, “I don’t know who Orpheus is, and I DON’T WANT TO KNOW.” So I too can only sigh . . .  and then resume “doing my gratitudes.”
Nevertheless, carefree happiness may be possible yet – moments of it, but that is enough. One of the surprises in recent years has been the much-replicated finding that people grow happier as they grow older. True, it took me a very long time to disassociate myself from Persephone as the traumatized young girl, but the privilege of growing older (and we must remember that not everyone has had that privilege) finally exerted its transformative power. Yes, I am aware that everything could be taken away in an instant, but I don’t focus on that thought. I’ve learned to do more and think less. I’ve learned to “gaze at the world” rather than constantly introspect. The practice of contentment is becoming easier. That feeling of not belonging becomes irrelevant; we belong to the universe; we belong to ourselves. How rich we are after all! Persephone, let us not forget, married the richest of the gods. AND she wasn’t confined to one world or the other.
Besides, as I write in one of my poems, “Asphodel,”
The ancients understood
the soul feeds on flowers. Even
in hell, a life filled with flowers.

**



John Guzlowski:


The blue window of Lake Michigan is a perfect image. I grew up in Chicago, in the ruins of so many dreams, the broken factories around various corners, the workingman's taverns, the long blocks of small shops that sold nothing, but there was always Lake Michigan and the streets and parks along its length.  In Chicago, the lake and the city came together for 38 miles and when I was a kid I spent so much time on that edge. The blue lake and the green parks in front of me and the city at my back. I didn't want to turn around.  When I finally left home, moved out of my parents' house, I rented a room in an apartment near the lake, and I tried to go there every day for a walk or a bike ride or just to sit.  

I hadn't thought about how much the lake meant to me, but of course it did.  It was the perfect place to dream. I remember riding my bike down there – the paths and sidewalks along the lake where great and you could go for hours and hours and never cross a street – amazing. 

I've written so many poems about the lake: its dreaming center.

But it's also the place where I went crazy.  When I did acid or smoked too much dope or got really drunk, I'd go to the lake -- like I was trying to get it all out of me in those cold waters, but most of the time I just ended up getting crazier or running into other people who were as lost as I was.  


And one winter after graduating from college I worked on the lake as a long shoreman.  There's a pier that sticks out into the lake about 1/2 mile, and boats used to line up along it and take on and drop off cargo. It was the only pier in the middle of the city and sitting at the end of the pier during lunch time and looking back into the city with all the sky above was always something.

Oriana:

Thank you, John for this dreamy post and poem. I especially love “I grew up in Chicago, in the ruins of so many dreams, the broken factories around various corners, the workingman's taverns, the long blocks of small shops that sold nothing, but there was always Lake Michigan.”

Even my first glimpse of the lake was amazing – another reality opening at the end of that long abandoned street: something  huge and primeval against the heartless capitalism that I felt back then in my first encounter with urban decay. Something beautiful in an eternal way.

That feeling of being lost may be part of being human, but it’s especially acute, I think, when we are leaving adolescence and experiencing the first shattering of dreams. Sometimes the city-scape mirrors that. The experience I describe was uncanny and unforgettable. It would have been an experience of despair – except for the jewel-like lake that suddenly came into view. It was a moment of grace. I was too exhausted to continue all the way to the strand, but I knew the lake was there. 

Scott:


Enjoyed your posting very much. It hit home in many ways. I like how you stated you made the decision to not be depressed. Too many times I will find myself focusing on negative things or things that COULD happen and letting it rob me of the here and now. Your blog should be required reading for many people. The insights and openness of yourself and the people who comment are refreshing in a world of blogs where so many are meaningless drivel. Your writing on loss of Poland and the idealized America you had would make a great book, very poignant. Thanks as always for your engaging blog. I recommend it to everyone.

Oriana:

Thank you, Scott, for praising the openness – not just mine, and that of the people who comment in this blog. For me the whole point of prose is not to produce forgettable upbeat chatter, but to share from the depths. If the story we tell is true – insofar as we are able to tell the truth – then complexity and subtlety, and even mystery and beauty will follow.

What startles me now is that for many years I realized I could indeed make the decision not to be depressed, but I had no motivation to do so. I don’t mean I could have made this decision in my youth, when most of the bad stuff was happening. That was an overwhelming situation, and I had neither wisdom nor other resources. I am grateful just to have survived. That I did not manage to stay sunny and keep smiling, that many times I sank into despair – I don’t blame myself for that. I don’t blame myself for not having been a Buddhist sage who could laugh at how every dream turned into a travesty.

But later I did have the skills and resources, and I still wasn’t motivated not to be depressed, preferring to brood over the misfortunes of the past (even that is understandable from the point of view of what neuroscientists call the “negativity bias”). It took the pressure of aging. What finally motivated me was the desire not to waste the rest of my life – once I truly understood that simple phrase, “the rest of my life.”

Lilith:


I remember when the Jean Shinoda Bolen book was so popular (was that the late 80's or early 90's?) and everybody was talking about what goddess they most identified with.  In fact, that book was one of the many that I ditched in my move this year, threw it in the dumpster.  Coming from the "pop psychology" point of view, her books were accessible to the new agers, and sold very well, as I recall. 

Grounded in the mythopoetical, as you are, as well as being an artist who has gone through the depths (and a genuine intellectual to boot), your writing about myths within us is powerful and true beyond anything a pop psychologizer could come up with.  I can see an entire book of yours, both prose and poems, about overcoming depression through living Greek mythology.  And it would be a far better book than Bolen's. But are we beyond the era of the book?  If so, the world has your wonderful blog to read.

Oriana:

Thank you, Lilith. I blush. And I think you are too hard on Shinoda, who was a pioneer after all, back in the mid-eighties. “Which goddess are you?” was an unfortunate sales gimmick, and Shinoda quickly points out that few women fit just one pattern – although now and then I do meet an overflowing Demeter, a tight-lipped, efficient Athena, or an athletic Artemis running with her dogs.  

The bigger question is whether the knowledge of mythology is helpful to us. There are those who claim that it’s time to drop those archaic stories. Who cares? they ask. Some of us do care because something in the story speaks to us deeply. And stories have a power to heal. In fact, certain myth could be perceived as stories about healing: Persephone’s transformation, Psyche’s tasks and journey through the underworld, the abandoned Ariadne’s marriage to Dionysus. In all of these, the young woman is traumatized, and then manages to unite with the divine.

It may be a different element of the story that speaks to us at different stages of life. At first, I identified with Persephone strictly from the point of view of trauma, of finding myself in the Dead City. Eventually I was able to connect with Persephone the Queen, a powerful image of transformation from trauma to royalty. 

But another woman might respond most to the notion that Demeter, with enormous love, went searching for her daughter. And yet another person might see a girl coming out of the earth, and it’s springtime.
After writing most of this post, I had a dream about a flood. The waters kept rising. And what was I trying to save? Books. Not any special books, just the first stack that was at hand. Because books stand for culture. The flood of illiteracy is rising, but there are always those who try to be the bearers of light. In the words of Hoelderlin, “Where danger grows, that which saves us grows also.” 

Scott:


I was re-reading your latest entry and fully agree with Lilith: your story of leaving Poland, coming to America and your life here would make a great book.

I think too that not only is myth not dead, we need  it more than ever and it continues in film and books in many different  forms. In your home of San Diego this week the Comic Con event is  going on, so much of the goings on there are taken straight from myth  or a close cousin. My teenage daughter is a big fan of the Greek and  Egyptian myths, I have been thinking of re-reading Kazantzakis'  fantastic epic on Odysseus this summer. A monster of an epic poem, it would keep me occupied until October when two Moby Dick related books  are due out!

Just last week I visited an old friend and was introduced to his girlfriend. After talking some I discover she is a big reader and is of Polish/Jewish heritage, her father came here in the 20's. My  friend is a devout atheist and big reader too. His favorite writer is Tolkien( which I find oddly ironic in that he was a lifelong devout  Catholic); I told them both to check your blog out. Please consider a book, it would make great reading.

Oriana:

First, a minor comment: a lot of atheists, especially if they could be described as “devout atheists,” have a basically religious temperament. They are bright, educated, and hungry for meaning. Organized religion has failed to nourish that hunger, but intelligent religious writers, those who don’t mechanically mouth the dogma, can be satisfying. At least they are concerned with the large issues and are themselves spiritual seekers and questioners who dare to think on their own. My favorite C.S. Lewis piece is the one with a rather Swedenborgian flavor: a bus to heaven makes its stop at the gates of hell. Any soul in hell that would prefer heaven is free to get on the bus. The bus leaves empty.


I think that like poetry, mythology (in all forms) has its relatively small but dedicated audience, and will not vanish from the culture. Those stories are an eternal comment on the human condition, and can be surprising (Odysseus rejecting immortality, returning to his palace in beggar’s rags), and inspiring (Psyche in her journey through the Underworld learning to “stay on task” and refusing to “feed the hungry ghosts”). Like a good preacher who makes the Gospel stories come to life by using modern-day examples, we keep re-interpreting the myths so they continue to have meaning for us.

The book that you and many others have been suggesting I write would go against the “happy immigrant” stereotype. It wouldn’t be exactly like I.B. Singer’s Lost in America, but that title immediately rings true for me, brings me back to that shattering first year. Native-born Americans would not care to hear about it. They want to hear about immigrant success, happiness, and gratitude for finding yourself in paradise. They don’t want to know about what I call the “immigrant trauma.”

After all, isn’t a person supposed to be happy just to be here? The last thing the readers would want is my starting with the sentence, “The greatest mistake I made in my life was leaving Poland.” I have given a lot of thought to this matter, and this continues to be my conclusion. I hasten to clarify that this was my greatest mistake from the point of view of personal happiness, but not necessarily from the perspective of becoming a writer, if that is given a superior value over the “pursuit of happiness.”

Interwoven with the immigrant trauma is, to use Milosz’s phrase, “the history of my stupidity.” And I have to concur with the ending of his poem (“Account”):

The history of my stupidity will not be written.
For one thing, it’s late. And the truth is laborious.

So I don’t foresee a book, but a continuation of what I have been bringing forth: poems and prose entries that reveal this or that aspect of a very complex story that's by no means finished. Vignettes. See, for instance, in this blog, The City of Tomorrow or the poem My America. 

Hyacinth:

I have always realized a room of one's own is only part of it. We also need an income of some sort.

The room must be quiet and have a door for privacy.  A writer needs a time without interruptions.

One line stood out for me: "the flood of illiteracy" – and a flood it has become. Most households have so many electronic devices, the way we used to have books everywhere. Children are "entertained" all the time and are not using their own creative minds, and they are not outdoors playing. This contributes to obesity. Play is a child's work of growing up and learning.

I loved "the blue window of Lake Michigan.” I’ve never been there but all waters for me are blue windows to nourishing the creativity of a poet.

Oriana:

Yes, ultimately there is no evading it, and Woolf was explicit: a woman writer needs sufficient income so that she doesn’t need to work for money. She needs to have enough money to buy her the time for writing, a time without interruptions. The destructive aspect of email is that it’s a constant interruption.

It seems that everyone loves that “blue window” of Lake Michigan. It was a glimpse of beauty at the end of the frightening street lined with abandoned buildings. I didn’t need to walk that far; it was enough to see that blue window to regain my connection with something real and lasting, something I could love.